Jeevan Vidya Intro
Jeevan Vidya... it's not really a philosophy... it is kind of... and I don't think it's exactly like Buddhism. It basically puts out this whole proposal of Existence. And, then, observe yourself and the world around you... and you'll start to come to an understanding, and check it with the proposal.
The basics are - Everyone person wants to be happy/have harmony/be fulfilled/content (whatever you want to call it). So, everything we do, in some way or another, we are trying to achieve this happiness. But, why aren't we always happy? The actions that we undertake to bring us happiness are based on our understanding. So, if there is a glich in our understanding, then the result of the action will not bring us the happiness we desired. So, the main work has to be done on our understanding. If one takes a look at any of the problems that one has, that is an obstacle to harmony/happiness than they will find that the root of each of these problems is a lack of understanding, somewhere.
So, then, it goes into the understanding of what? Of everything... what's everything? Well, there's me, and then there's everything else. So, understanding the "I" and understanding everything else in "Existence" - which consists of I, my family, society, and nature. And the relationship btwn each of these.
It goes on to give a proposal to the Reality of all these things.
One thing that stands out for me is in the understanding of the "I"... understanding the difference btwn. "believing" something and "knowing" something. Almost EVERYTHING we live by is our beliefs... and this is where differences arise. Also, we have to closely examine where these beliefs come from... they come from some type of conditioning or memories.... books, TV, parents, education, media, alternate media, prior memories, etc. "Knowing" something is the ability to naturally accept something and is universal for everyone. "Knowing" is knowing that when one is thirsty, water will quench their thirst. "Believing" is that with this meal, a soda would jive better. "Knowing" is knowing that everyone wants to be happy/ fulfilled/ in harmony/ content. "Believing" is I need x amount of money to be happy.
It goes on... and in more detail... which I haven't really even delved into too much. For now, I'm sticking with the basics.
And I think... the process in this... and in Vipassana... and according to Krishnamurti.... is developing the ability of PURE OBSERVATION. What is pure observation? The ability to observe with all our senses... without any preconceived notions, prejudices, conditioning, memories, etc. clouding our vision. With this, the separation of believing and knowing becomes clearer. Is it possible? I don't know....
3 Comments:
still trying to understand this PURE OBSERVATION, does that mean you do not have any pre-conceived notions? What if this applies to people you meet, but you have known them for years---do this PURE OBSERVATION really work? And, isn't life and law for that matter not about pure observation? Isn't it about looking at the past to see what things went wrong and learn from those those mistakes? It seems pure observation is looking at things as if you were 'born again' sorry for cliche. What are your thoughts???
get ur ofoto password back yet?
I don't know. But, I don't think it means that you always have to be in a state of "PURE OBSERVATION". It means that you are tying to develop this ability of "PURE OBSERVATION". Learning from the past, from my prior mistakes, etc... is GOOD. But, the idea is still to be AWARE of it. If someone isn't AWARE, then they are bound to make the same mistakes. And learning... I think... in it's true sense is something that is self-discovered. You can read something in a book about history and believe it... or, you can experience it, observe it, be aware of it... and then REALLY learn it. Books, history, etc... are all, in the end, just viewpoints... and should be used as tools, and not the END. (sorry, for the rambling... this is an unorganized response... and I still haven't clarified my thoughts on this).
And law... to me, is created because human beings are imperfect. The ideal is to transcend "law".
The world isn't perfect... and none of us are perfect... but the idea is to continue striving towards it, and not get stuck in systems that condition us to live unnatural, unjust, selfish lives (usually.. without even knowing it because it's hidden by the system).
So, maybe "law" must evolve as well. And think of new ways of controlling society, other than "fear".
Post a Comment
<< Home